I’ll be making some presentational changes to the blog over the weekend. Votes were overwhelmingly in favour of de-orangification! Looks like there will be a new email subscription system for new subscribers, but old subscribers will still get deliveries via Feedburner without doing anything.
I’ve made a few slight changes to the blog I thought I ought to explain. The UKBA press department has gone mad in recent months and produces so much garbage it drowns out the other items in the news feed. I’ve therefore separated it out into its own box. I might also filter out the various UKBA enforcement announcements bollocks (it’s all very Two Minutes) but not tonight. I’ve promoted the much-clicked-upon BAILII case law feed to the top of the left hand panel but limited it to five items, which is usually enough to see anything new.
On the right hand side, the HJT Training advert is back with news of the upcoming annual judicial review conference (and will continue to come and go at the top of the right hand column to promote upcoming courses or conferences), and I’ve also made explicit my links with HJT in a new Training page.
I’m getting a bit bored of the orange theme and the current blog design generally and am considering another re-vamp – which is a decent excuse for another of these gimmicky poll things:
Following a comment on the comments system, I thought I better do a quick update. Firstly, I’ve been very busy recently and as a result have not been posting as frequently or extensively as normal. This is inevitable, I’m afraid, and given that there are so many email subscribers (115 at last count, after I purged a few dormant ones) I would rather try to avoid ‘fillers’.
There is still a lot going on out there (or sometimes not, which is itself worthy of comment) and I’m planning a proper post for later today if I can make time.
As to the new comments system, WordPress have introduced a new feature which permits what is called ‘nesting’ of comments. This enables reply to a particular comment, which I thought might be useful on this blog. I’ve also reversed the order of comments, so that the most recent comments appear at the top of the list. I think this is an improvement as it avoids a lot of scrolling, although obviously at the expense of normal chronology.
Comments on useability welcome. There was no way not to make these changes retrospective and on the couple of old posts I looked at the nesting seemed mainly to work.
P.S. I looked for a stocking filler image for this post, but the results didn’t seem suitable.
But lacks the energy to write anything intelligent. Par for the course, some might claim. I have however been deleting the many comments I now unfortunately receive asking for legal advice. Inevitable, I suppose. Instead of informed, witty, incisive commentary I shall content myself with some random alerts:
Metock guidance is finally available. The Entry Clearance Guidance has been amended at chapter 21 and the European Casework Instructions have been amended at chapters 1, 2, 3 and 5. I haven’t managed to scan in Operational Policy Instruction 103, which came with the January ILPA mailing and as far as I know doesn’t yet exist on the internet. Analysis to follow, maybe.
Still no news on Baiai or on RN (Zimbabwe).
Woolas’ ramblings on cutting back on judicial review have been revealed as hot air. There’s a new policy not to automatically suspend removals where exactly the same grounds are relied on within three months of the last ones. I know there are some chancers out there but I can’t imagine there are many example of this and even Lin Homer has said she doesn’t think many cases will be affected.
Free Movement is considering a loose tie-in with HJT Training to help pay the actual and virtual rent. Perhaps a page on the top bar next to ‘Archives’. I’ve attended their courses before and would in fact be happy to endorse them. Thoughts on selling out (selling out what exactly?) etc sort of welcome.
After a long day in court fighting a losing battle and with plenty of work still to do before Christmas, Free Movement is signing off until well into the New Year.
I’m knackered and need a break.
A number of fellow immigration lawyers have commented that it is always busy around Christmas. The Immigration Service does seem to have a tendency to schedule removals for public holidays, when pesky lawyers will be less able to intervene to safeguard people’s rights.
I’ve decided to make a few changes to the blog, which I hope are improvements. Comments from regular readers most welcome. Incidentally, I checked Feedburner recently and was surprised to see there are 62 of you out there who subscribe by email. A bit of a ‘hello Mum!’ moment for me, but I hope you find this useful.
I’ve changed the ‘theme’, which is the pre-set format for the site. I’m not clever enough to design my own, and I do still have a life outside blogging. Free Movement now has three columns instead of two, and on the left hand column I have inserted two new update tools for readers. One is a compilation of immigration news from various news websites. The other is a list of recent immigration cases sourced from BAILII. Most will be profoundly uninterested in how this is done, but the boxes on the blog will automatically update themselves. I hope. The feeds behind them were created using Yahoo Pipes and those who are interested can subscribe to these feeds directly if they want to by clicking on the RSS icons on the blog.
The news is compiled from UKBA, the Beeb, The Guardian (of course!), The Indy, The Times and The Telegraph. It is filtered only to include articles which mention certain words, so it should include most if not all immigration stories. When there is a big story on, the stories in the box will be a bit repetitive, but it is always interesting to compare and contrast the coverage! I may change the sources and number of stories displayed once I’ve seen how well or otherwise this works over the next few days.
The cases are filtered in a similar way, so it is only Asylum and Immigration Tribunal cases plus other cases in other courts where the Secretary of State for the Home Department or Asylum and Immigration Tribunal is a party. That is most if not all immigration cases, but some non immigration cases will sometimes creep in.
I’ve had to lose the masthead, which was a picture of some asylum seekers playing football in the snow at Oakington Reception Centre one winter. It means the blog is even more text-heavy than before, but there’s not much that can be done about that.
Let me know what you think, and please tell me if there any problems or omissions.
Via a comment left on this site, I’ve been made aware of an excellent blog called EU Case Law, which I’ve added to my ‘blogroll’. It’s a really good way of keeping up to date with the latest legal developments in Europe and certainly covers free movement issues, as today’s update makes abundantly clear. It isn’t a specific immigration site, but it nevertheless looks invaluable to immigration lawyers.
A millionaire peer was elected leader of the UK Independence Party yesterday after putting "the growing threat of Islamism" and curbing immigration at the heart of his campaign.
Passengers returning to the UK via Manchester International Airport are being encouraged to save time at the border by using our facial recognition gates.
From 30 November 2009, the UK Border Agency is introducing fingerprint checks at the border for passengers with biometric UK visas, entry clearances and identity cards for foreign nationals.
This podcast was recorded at the Refugee Studies Centre’s Annual Harrell-Bond Lecture which was on Wednesday 18th November 2009 at the Museum of Natural History, University of Oxford. The Harrell-Bond Lecture is held annually in honour of Dr Barbara Harrell-Bond, founding former director of the Centre and of the academic field of refugee studies or [...]
11 December 2009, 10am to 5pm, Landmark Chambers, 6 CPD
Richard Drabble QC as chair David Jones of Garden Court on fresh claims Sheona York of IAS on running test cases James Packer of Duncan Lewis on funding and costs Tim Buley of Landmark on detention Mark Henderson of Doughty Street on the relationship between the Admin Court and Treasury Solicitors Mark Symes of Garden Court on 3rd country removals Colin Yeo of Renaissance Chambers on transfer of judicial review to the tribunal
The information and commentary on the law on this web site is provided free of charge for information purposes only. Every reasonable effort is made to make the information and commentary accurate and up to date at the date each item is published, but no responsibility for its accuracy and correctness, or for any consequences of relying on it, is assumed by the author. The information and commentary does not, and is not intended to, amount to legal advice to any person on a specific case or matter. You are strongly advised to obtain specific, personal advice from a lawyer about your case or matter and not to rely on the information or comments on this site.