Free Movement

Updates and commentary on immigration and asylum law

  • Subscribe

  • Search this blog

  • Comments

    Please do not ask for legal advice or advice on your individual case by leaving comments. Any such comments will be deleted and will not receive replies. At the top of the page there is advice available on the law and on finding a lawyer. Other comments are very welcome!
  • Category cloud

  • Category list

  • Blog Stats

    • 364,521 hits
  • Disclaimer

    The information and commentary on the law on this web site is provided free of charge for information purposes only. Every reasonable effort is made to make the information and commentary accurate and up to date at the date each item is published, but no responsibility for its accuracy and correctness, or for any consequences of relying on it, is assumed by the author. The information and commentary does not, and is not intended to, amount to legal advice to any person on a specific case or matter. You are strongly advised to obtain specific, personal advice from a lawyer about your case or matter and not to rely on the information or comments on this site.

Local immigration enforcement

Posted by freemovement on 20 June 2008

I just came across a surprising Home Office press release. Usually, Home Office immigration press releases are recycled and re-used dribble. The ‘new’ ‘points’ based ’system’ (I’d question the accuracy of all of these words) has been announced again and again and again, for example.

This one might just be a bit different. The stuff about local immigration teams is frankly disturbing. I have christened them Smith’s Home Office Immigration Teams, or SHITs. The Home Office can’t control their people with a highly centralised system, so a devolved one is asking for trouble. There are already too many illegal removals resulting in compensation claims, unlawful detentions and incidents like this. The tone of the press release makes these SHITs sound like some sort of sinister neighbourhood watch, except aimed at immigrants rather than criminals. Who will they be working alongside in local communities? Those who want their neighbour deported? I called the Immigration Advisory Service — a charity that represents immigrants — about a case the other day and had to convince some call centre battery chicken that I wasn’t calling to shop an illegal immigrant before I could get through. It is a sign of the times that they have to screen their calls in this way.

Check out this quote from Councillor Mike Rye, Leader of Conservative-controlled Enfield Council:

“Having a UKBA officer in situ in our offices will be an immense help in all areas of our work – I am really pleased that Enfield Council has been chosen to pilot this new way of working. This partnership will be a great asset in helping us combat fraud, speeding up checks on the immigration status of people applying for council services, and improving the exchange of information between the Council and the UK Border Agency for child protection purposes.”

I thought I’d check out the press release claim that the names of defaulting employers who employ illegal immigrants are to be published on the Home Office website. It’s true! They are actually doing it. They are bravely taking down major players in the international people trafficking business like, er, chip shops and take aways. I don’t see the directors of supermarkets or big food processing companies being done yet. Instead we’ll have small ethnic minority employers being forced out of business, or the SHITs growing fat on fast food and take away protection-in-kind.

The fines are bad news for those concerned - £5,000 or £10,000 a pop. I’d have thought that is enough to put most small businesses out of commission. Well done, Jacqui, it’s not as if there’s a recession around the corner or anything. Putting these people and their employees out of jobs and into debt is really going to help, both with community cohesion and with the economy.

2 Responses to “Local immigration enforcement”

  1. andy said

    Interesting to see the adverts on tv at present,regarding the licences required to legally employ non european workers.The advert’s use of ‘hurdles’ implies a deliberate degree of awkwardness and discouragement almost? R.I.P the local kebab shop!

  2. Well FM at least there is one axiom of this issue of these interfering SHITs. There is never a danger of this lot being a shining example for the rest of the enforcement sector; as we all know you cannot polish a turd! (or can you?)

    When the National Audit Office come to check efficency ratings of the department does that qualify as a stool sample?

    (I’m sure I left my coat here somewhere?!)

    I’m 1/2 tempted to ring up the HO and report them for employing illegal security guards, do you think they’d prosecute themselves? Especially given the recent HMSP debacle.

    But i’d agree with FM, the 1/4 wit fashion (note less than 1/2 wit) approach is quite clear from this recent incident ->
    http://freehichamyezza.wordpress.com/

    These new guys will probably have all the operational efficency of a dvd-rewinder.

    I’m off to get a takeaway before it gets shut down !

    P.S. without a doubt this is the funniest thing I have read all week!

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>