<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chindamo and European citizenship</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freemovement.wordpress.com/2007/09/07/chindamo-and-european-citizenship/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freemovement.wordpress.com/2007/09/07/chindamo-and-european-citizenship/</link>
	<description>Updates and commentary on immigration and asylum law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 22:54:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Directiva 2004/38 si cetatenia Uniunii Europene. Sau de ce, conform dreptului comunitar, este atat de greu sa expulzezi un resortisant comunitar dintr-un stat membru&#8230; &#171; &#8220;Dreptul comunitar al afacerilor&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://freemovement.wordpress.com/2007/09/07/chindamo-and-european-citizenship/#comment-727</link>
		<dc:creator>Directiva 2004/38 si cetatenia Uniunii Europene. Sau de ce, conform dreptului comunitar, este atat de greu sa expulzezi un resortisant comunitar dintr-un stat membru&#8230; &#171; &#8220;Dreptul comunitar al afacerilor&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 19:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freemovement.wordpress.com/2007/09/07/chindamo-and-european-citizenship/#comment-727</guid>
		<description>[...] by sketis on November 13th, 2007  Un &#8220;post&#8221; (sic!), adica mesagiu scris pe un blog merita citat aici. Omul descrie succint obiectivul [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by sketis on November 13th, 2007  Un &#8220;post&#8221; (sic!), adica mesagiu scris pe un blog merita citat aici. Omul descrie succint obiectivul [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freemovement</title>
		<link>http://freemovement.wordpress.com/2007/09/07/chindamo-and-european-citizenship/#comment-490</link>
		<dc:creator>freemovement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 09:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freemovement.wordpress.com/2007/09/07/chindamo-and-european-citizenship/#comment-490</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Bondwoman. You are absolutely right, it was previously hard to deport EC nationals, but the new Directive takes it to a new level. One of the particularly interesting things to watch will be how the ECJ reconciles its previous &#039;pro-citizenship&#039; case law with the new Directive, which is arguably less generous than ECJ case law in some areas.

I&#039;ve added a link to your blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Bondwoman. You are absolutely right, it was previously hard to deport EC nationals, but the new Directive takes it to a new level. One of the particularly interesting things to watch will be how the ECJ reconciles its previous &#8216;pro-citizenship&#8217; case law with the new Directive, which is arguably less generous than ECJ case law in some areas.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve added a link to your blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bondwoman</title>
		<link>http://freemovement.wordpress.com/2007/09/07/chindamo-and-european-citizenship/#comment-486</link>
		<dc:creator>Bondwoman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 17:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freemovement.wordpress.com/2007/09/07/chindamo-and-european-citizenship/#comment-486</guid>
		<description>I wrote about some of the EU citizenship implications. Actually, the protection was pretty strong under Directive 64/221, in the sense that it required individualised consideration of the situation. The Citizens&#039; Rights directive does go further, but it&#039;s more an incremental development of a combination of the previous law and the case law, plus the institution of the new right of permanent residence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote about some of the EU citizenship implications. Actually, the protection was pretty strong under Directive 64/221, in the sense that it required individualised consideration of the situation. The Citizens&#8217; Rights directive does go further, but it&#8217;s more an incremental development of a combination of the previous law and the case law, plus the institution of the new right of permanent residence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
